You are currently in: Home > Planning Officers Society News > Draft NPPF is Heroic Attempt to Condense and Clarify Vast Tangle of Government Policy says POS

Draft NPPF is Heroic Attempt to Condense and Clarify Vast Tangle of Government Policy says POS

Date: 5/8/2011

The draft National Planning Policy Framework is a heroic attempt to condense and clarify a vast tangle of Government policy. But such a drastic reduction as this is bound to have gaps, errors and uncertainties; so says POS.

Here are just a few concerns, taken from the Planning Officers Society's detailed critique of the Framework:

  • the duty of authorities to cooperate on strategic matters needs further strengthening, if joint working at a local level is to be an effective replacement  for the loss of the strategic tier of planning. The Society will be coming forward with detailed proposals;
  • the Government's mixed message, about localism versus centrally-driven policy objectives, is perpetuated in this document, with little or no acknowledgement of the importance of localism as an element of national planning policy;
  • the new regime is based on a definition of "sustainability" that seems very strongly biased towards economic considerations. We fear the question "what is sustainable?" could become a major debating point and an obstacle to progress. We propose an approach that uses localism to reduce uncertainty on the matter;
  • We foresee a range of difficulties for individual authorities in setting housing figures that: win the support of local communities while also complying with Government policy; deal satisfactorily with the question of migration and respond to the Framework's expectations for affordable housing delivery;
  • Existing Green Belt policy is restated with only detailed changes. This represents a lost opportunity to revisit and refresh this sixty-year old policy in the light of the changed world in which it now operates;
  • One Government hope for the "presumption in favour" is that it will reduce the number of appeals; we fear the opposite could be the case. The last time such a presumption was in operation, appeals ran at record levels, about twice their current rate.

John Silvester, Society Publicity Officer & Spokesperson, said "the Society will be submitting its detailed response to the Framework consultation in September, although a draft is available for POS Members in our Members-only library on the website."

Any POS member wishing to comment on the Society's draft response should contact Stuart Hylton.

Go to the POS Members-only Library


   To Top         Back   
Bookmark and Share