HOME | CONTACT | HELP | FORUMS | APPLY | MEMBER LOGIN
SEARCH:
PLANNING OFFICERS SOCIETY HEADER PLANNING OFFICERS SOCIETY LOGO
PLANNING OFFICERS SOCIETY LOGO
POS INFO |  <-> COMMITTEES |  <-> BEST VALUE |  <-> LDF PROJECT |  <-> DM PRACTICE PROJECT |  <-> POS ENTERPRISES LTD |  <-> LIBRARY |  <-> NEWS |  <-> EVENTS & TRAINING |  <-> SOCIETY LINKS |  <->

YOU ARE HERE
Article

CURRENT USERS
Users online: 3
Members online: 0


POS Resposne to Planning Gain Supplement and PPS3
The proposed Planning Gain Supplement tries to address two objectives and potentially fails with both. A tax to capture betterment from the grant of planning permission for the community has a long history and strong supporting arguments. Resourcing infrastructure to deliver sustainable development and communities is a real and pressing need.

Current rating: 4 / 5 | Rate this article

SAVE Save PRINT Print EMAIL Email

POS thanks all those who have contributed to the response to these consultations. Whilst there were differing views this submission represents a significant majority who considered that on balance PGS would be beset with practical problems of operation and sever the linkages between the delivery of infrastructure and benefits and the development creating those requirements. There was, however, much unanimity on the response to PPS3.

Full resposne available (94.72Kb) - DOWNLOAD

 


   © 2009 Planning Officers society ~ Site powered by Connectplus+