<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/xsl/trans.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:cms="http://www.workssitebuilder.co.uk/syndication"><channel><title>Planning Officers Society</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk</link><description>What's coming soon?&#13;
Watch out for details of the Society's follow-up to its Summit conference with leading Conservative politicians.&#13;
 </description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:41:51 +0100</pubDate><cms:feedfile>POS Articles </cms:feedfile><item><title>Overhead Telecommunications Cables Consultation</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/7c6f7cbc96b55fe8606282b5a10059ab/overhead-telecommunications-cables-consultation.html</link><description>This response on behalf of OS relates to Overhead Telecommunications Cables consultation.</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/7c6f7cbc96b55fe8606282b5a10059ab/overhead-telecommunications-cables-consultation.html</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:50:50 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Response to CIPFA's BVACOP 2010</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/a8969251e8c9ee8b6116cfc6a646b26b/response-to-cipfas-bvacop-2010.html</link><description>POS Response to CIPFAs BVACOP 2010 consultation.</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/a8969251e8c9ee8b6116cfc6a646b26b/response-to-cipfas-bvacop-2010.html</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:12:43 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Management </title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/aba34eeb3a8a97a09753192b15b644dd/management-performance-committee-110909.html</link><description>Notes of the Management and Performance Committee held at the RTPI on 11th September 2009</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/aba34eeb3a8a97a09753192b15b644dd/management-performance-committee-110909.html</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:56:25 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Flooding </title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/c88873971e5b40ad0548073b16037d17/flooding-planning.html</link><description>presentation by John Silvester at the LGA Annual Rural Conference 9th September 2009</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/c88873971e5b40ad0548073b16037d17/flooding-planning.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:46:33 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>The Impact of the Revised PPG3 on Car Parking Policy - Response by POS</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/f02d38b202a53bea7569f0360377c8f5/the-impact-of-the-revised-ppg3-on-car-parking-policy-response-by-pos.html</link><description>POS was asked by CLG to comment on the impact the revised PPG3 has had on car parking policy, as it would appear that as a consequence of some recent appeal decisions PINS is still working to the idea that restricting available parking at residential properties will restrict car ownership at those properties.</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/f02d38b202a53bea7569f0360377c8f5/the-impact-of-the-revised-ppg3-on-car-parking-policy-response-by-pos.html</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:58:45 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Greater Flexibility for Planning Permissions Consultation</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/b21410ba74ed63da94e5621ec1194886/greater-flexibility-for-planning-permissions-consultation.html</link><description>The Society has supported the recommendations of the Killian Pretty Review in respect of the need for greater proportionality in the planning system.  However it is our view that this consultation will lead to additional burdens being placed on users of the system, countering the drive for greater proportionality.  This is particularly so in relation to the proposals for dealing with non material amendments to details already approved.</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/b21410ba74ed63da94e5621ec1194886/greater-flexibility-for-planning-permissions-consultation.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:36:35 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>LPA Protected Species Legal Duty</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/a1220aa7fe451f65a4a2cc647df6714c/lpa-protected-species-legal-duty.html</link><description>briefing note on a court judgement against an LPA</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/a1220aa7fe451f65a4a2cc647df6714c/lpa-protected-species-legal-duty.html</guid><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:24:11 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Draft PPS4 Planning for Prosperous Communities</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/e9cdc97b37144d2d449606e57ee982c4/draft-pps4-planning-for-prosperous-communities.html</link><description>The early review of policy statements </description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/e9cdc97b37144d2d449606e57ee982c4/draft-pps4-planning-for-prosperous-communities.html</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:46:22 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Consultation: Houses in multiple occupation and possible planning responses - POS Response</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/fc60c63669c53b64c3b85a01b33c141e/consultation-houses-in-multiple-occupation-and-possible-planning-responses-pos-response.html</link><description>The Society welcomes the DCLGs appreciation of the problems associated with HMOs, and of the need to review the effectiveness of current planning controls.</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/fc60c63669c53b64c3b85a01b33c141e/consultation-houses-in-multiple-occupation-and-possible-planning-responses-pos-response.html</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:30:02 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>CURRENT POSITION ON RSS COMPLETION AND REVIEWS AND SNR TRANSITION ARRANGEMENTS (JULY 2009)</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/ad57b886c0945e49c6bb08569687f7d4/current-position-on-rss-completion-and-reviews-and-snr-transition-arrangements-july-2009.html</link><description>updated review now available</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/ad57b886c0945e49c6bb08569687f7d4/current-position-on-rss-completion-and-reviews-and-snr-transition-arrangements-july-2009.html</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:34:41 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>CONSULTATION ON TEMPORARY STRUCTURES FOR EVENTS</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/6ab3fe4f86517b125329a68125430756/consultation-on-temporary-structures-for-events.html</link><description>There appears to be a growing demand for temporary structures and events across the country and, taking into account the potential for many one-off events linked to the Olympics in 2012, this is likely to continue. Therefore the Society acknowledges the need for such a guide and supports the comprehensive draft subject to a few minor comments below.</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/6ab3fe4f86517b125329a68125430756/consultation-on-temporary-structures-for-events.html</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:39:43 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Spatial Planning </title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/17b893807c0b943c29efb5b31f36fed7/spatial-planning-policy-committee-110909.html</link><description>Notes of the Spatial Planning </description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/17b893807c0b943c29efb5b31f36fed7/spatial-planning-policy-committee-110909.html</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:57:25 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>HPDG allocation mechanism (yrs 2 </title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/41ff3c21267ca668461be5cb8155d812/hpdg-allocation-mechanism-yrs-2-3-consultation.html</link><description>POS regrets the planned reduction in HPDG proposed over the next two years. This will hamper delivery of DPDs and housing. Mitigating circumstances should be taken into account.</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/41ff3c21267ca668461be5cb8155d812/hpdg-allocation-mechanism-yrs-2-3-consultation.html</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:30:26 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Judicial Review Article 22 of the Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure Order) 1995</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/cec133cace343307c84e35a1a13d13ad/jr-re-article-22-of-the-town-and-country-planning-general-development-procedure-order-1995.html</link><description>A recent Judicial Review (JR) ruling obtained from Mr JUSTICE SALES regarding compliance with Article 22 of the Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure Order) 1995.</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/cec133cace343307c84e35a1a13d13ad/jr-re-article-22-of-the-town-and-country-planning-general-development-procedure-order-1995.html</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:53:10 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Compliance with PPS25</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/82ed69e763c0dc58b217114cd2491a06/compliance-with-pps25.html</link><description>A "no blame" discussion reviewing how far development is taking place that is at odds with PPS25, why this is, and what can be done about it was held on 11 June between colleagues from LGA/CLG/PAS  EA and POS colleagues had sent comments ahead of the meeting for discussion.</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/82ed69e763c0dc58b217114cd2491a06/compliance-with-pps25.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:27:16 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>POS Response on Procedures for Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/567433c6907d3c9f32d70e123981bb12/pos-response-on-procedures-for-nationally-significant-infrastructure-projects.html</link><description>This response on behalf of the Planning Officers Society relates to the Consultation on the Pre-Application Consultation and Application Procedures for Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects - March 2009</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/567433c6907d3c9f32d70e123981bb12/pos-response-on-procedures-for-nationally-significant-infrastructure-projects.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:55:49 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>BPF Response re Major Development Sites and Section 106 Obligations</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/bb70687363dfcb1df4d6a2c236ebe978/bpf-response-re-major-development-sites-and-section-106-obligations.html</link><description>BPF response, with POS as a signatory, to CLG re Major Development Sites and Section 106 Obligations</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/bb70687363dfcb1df4d6a2c236ebe978/bpf-response-re-major-development-sites-and-section-106-obligations.html</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:23:58 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>Response to Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/840d4308f19fa2995ed2532d470c1b55/response-to-local-democracy-economic-development-and-construction-bill.html</link><description>Letter from POS President to the Rt Hon. John Healey MP and Mr Sadiq Khan MP</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/840d4308f19fa2995ed2532d470c1b55/response-to-local-democracy-economic-development-and-construction-bill.html</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:06:26 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>POS Response to CIL Consultation</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/17120c4f64c430ca739047d9f1c25d45/pos-response-to-cil-consultation.html</link><description>POS has been actively involved in the development of the CIL proposals, recognising their significance to our members and the potential implications they will have when implemented. This gives us a unique understanding of the implications for LPAs and their views. The comments in this response have been prepared with the knowledge coming from this work as well as contributions from individual authorities and members.</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/17120c4f64c430ca739047d9f1c25d45/pos-response-to-cil-consultation.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:04:15 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>POS Response to Improving Permitted Development Consultation</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/3a88d3580bf5691259792a6c0191e98d/pos-response-to-improving-permitted-development-consultation.html</link><description>The Society has actively engaged in the work undertaken by White Young Green on behalf of DCLG which has informed this consultation document. At the time of that exercise the Society supported the general thrust to remove from the need to apply for planning permission those developments which did not have impacts.</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/3a88d3580bf5691259792a6c0191e98d/pos-response-to-improving-permitted-development-consultation.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:06:55 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>POS Seeks to Influence Emerging Conservative Planning Policy</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/f5f783994db17eab785f70f3e14c902e/pos-seeks-to-influence-emerging-conservative-planning-policy.html</link><description>Bob Neill MP, the Conservative Shadow Planning Minister, at the Planning Officers Society Summit Conference held yesterday indicated that the current evolution of Conservative planning policy would be firmed up in their Green Paper in December. However, he emphasised that their thoughts on policy were still evolving and that he was open to suggestions. The Society will be pursuing this further with him.</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/f5f783994db17eab785f70f3e14c902e/pos-seeks-to-influence-emerging-conservative-planning-policy.html</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:30 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>POS Response to Taking forward the Killian Pretty Review : Annex A  Development Management Framework  Consultation Exercise</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/81908fcf81d3febf765d9467aef3b866/pos-response-to-taking-forward-the-killian-pretty-review-annex-a-development-management-framework-consultation-exercise.html</link><description>This response on behalf of the Planning Officers Society (POS) relates to taking forward the Killian Pretty Review: Annex A  Development Management Framework  Consultation Exercise.</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/81908fcf81d3febf765d9467aef3b866/pos-response-to-taking-forward-the-killian-pretty-review-annex-a-development-management-framework-consultation-exercise.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:37:40 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>POS Response to Streamlining Information Requirements for Planning Applications consultation</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/6b96a3a34c28be93d7ea4b7cbfd7a8c7/pos-response-to-streamlining-information-requirements-for-planning-applications-consultation.html</link><description>The Planning Officers Society has engaged extensively with the Killian Pretty Review and supports their call for the information requirements for planning applications to be clearer, simpler and more proportionate. The consultation paper is welcomed.</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/6b96a3a34c28be93d7ea4b7cbfd7a8c7/pos-response-to-streamlining-information-requirements-for-planning-applications-consultation.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:30:51 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>POS Response to Publicity for Planning Applications Consultation</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/649d9d76215456dede98b12f310a1c94/pos-response-to-publicity-for-planning-applications-consultation.html</link><description>The Planning Officers Society welcomes the Government decision to review the current requirements for publicising planning applications. The Society is a keen advocate of public involvement in the planning process. However, current inflexible requirements mean that local planning authorities have to spend millions of pounds of taxpayers money on ineffective methods of advertising what may often be very small scale proposals of limited interest.</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/649d9d76215456dede98b12f310a1c94/pos-response-to-publicity-for-planning-applications-consultation.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:20:58 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>The Future of Strategic Spatial Planning</title><link>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/ab7bc6647b82ccff1d4b73318c9fd1f2/the-future-of-strategic-spatial-planning.html</link><description>The Planning Officers Society (POS) firmly believes that there is a need for strategic spatial planning  - between national and local levels - to address the challenges of a rapidly changing and complex world.  Strategic spatial planning is also essential to provide a framework for and influence over long-term investment decisions.  These matters cannot be left to local determination alone, although they should be informed by local evidence and views.</description><guid>http://www.planningofficers.org.uk/file/ab7bc6647b82ccff1d4b73318c9fd1f2/the-future-of-strategic-spatial-planning.html</guid><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:25:52 +0100</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
